{
  "card": "t_592b3c4a",
  "verification_date": "2026-10-16",
  "note": "Every KILLED or CORRECTED item from verification_log.md, with the replacement figure and the source that carries it. Verdicts are CONFIRMED / CORRECTED / KILLED / UNVERIFIABLE; only CORRECTED and KILLED appear here.",
  "killed": [
    {
      "id": "V1",
      "claim": "Palmer et al. (2018) surveyed 114 community-dwelling stroke survivors with aphasia.",
      "where": "vault page synthesis-aphasia-therapy-evidence (carried into L1 as a flagged source anomaly)",
      "verdict": "KILLED",
      "reason": "The published paper reports 278 patients, not 114. No subset denominator of 114 is stated in the paper; the 114 appears to be a vault transcription error.",
      "replacement": "278 patients in 21 UK speech and language therapy departments, 2014-2016.",
      "source": "https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200096",
      "quote": "This paper revisits provision based on what was received by 278 patients in 21 UK speech and language therapy departments in 2014-2016."
    }
  ],
  "corrected": [
    {
      "id": "V2",
      "claim": "Recommended SLT establishment in community teams: 0.4 WTE per unit.",
      "where": "L2 services_table.json, Community Rehabilitation Team / ICSS community therapy row",
      "verdict": "CORRECTED",
      "reason": "Unit wrong. The audit reports 0.4 WTE per 100 patients, not per service unit.",
      "replacement": "0.4 WTE per 100 patients (national median for community-based multidisciplinary teams).",
      "source": "https://www.hqip.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Ref.-296-SSNAP-2021-Post-acute-Organisational-Audit-National-Report-Final.pdf",
      "quote": "Speech and language therapist | 0.4 | 46.6% (41) | 29.1% (25) | 33.8% (24) | 0.45 | 0.3-0.7  (Table 3.3: Staffing levels: whole time equivalent of staff per 100 patients)"
    },
    {
      "id": "V3",
      "claim": "BCPPA plus is delivered by a highly specialist HCPC-registered SLT (over 80%) or a trained assistant under supervision.",
      "where": "L1 treatments_table.json, BCPPA plus provider / TIDieR 'who provided' cell",
      "verdict": "CORRECTED",
      "reason": "The protocol's second deliverer is a local collaborator SLT, not a trained assistant. The 'trained assistant' wording is an inference the source does not support.",
      "replacement": "Delivered by a research assistant who is a highly specialist HCPC-registered SLT (majority, over 80% of delivery) or by a local collaborator SLT, under supervision from the chief investigator.",
      "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13475093",
      "quote": "An RA: a highly specialist, Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC)-registered SLT ...; the majority (over 80%) of the intervention will be delivered by the RA, or"
    },
    {
      "id": "V4",
      "claim": "64 barriers stated in the vault's CFIR 2.0 vocabulary.",
      "where": "L3 t_7e7e7ab2 completion metadata and cfir_eric_map.csv construct column",
      "verdict": "CORRECTED",
      "reason": "The construct vocabulary is a CFIR 1.0 / CFIR 2.0 hybrid with non-CFIR (COM-B and TDF) labels, not uniformly CFIR 2.0. About 32 of the 64 rows use a construct label that is not a CFIR 2.0 construct name (for example 'Implementation Climate', 'Readiness for Implementation', 'Networks and Communications', 'Policy and Incentives', 'Patient Needs and Resources', 'Evidence Strength and Quality', 'Design Quality and Packaging', 'Executing', 'Knowledge and Beliefs', 'Self-efficacy and Confidence', 'Personal Attributes'), and some rows use invented COM-B hybrids not present in any CFIR version ('Deliverers: Capability (COM-B) / Knowledge', 'Deliverers: Capability / Skills', 'Recipients: Opportunity (COM-B)'). The underlying barriers are real and the ERIC side is clean; the defect is the labelling claim.",
      "replacement": "The map mixes CFIR 1.0 construct names, CFIR 2.0 construct names and non-CFIR (COM-B/TDF) labels. It should be described as a CFIR 1.0/2.0 hybrid vocabulary, not 'CFIR 2.0 vocabulary'. CFIR 2.0 renames the 1.0 constructs (Intervention Characteristics -> Innovation; Knowledge and Beliefs -> Capability; and so on).",
      "source": "https://cfirguide.org/constructs",
      "quote": "Updated CFIR Constructs ... A. Innovation Source ... B. Innovation Evidence-Base ... C. Innovation Relative Advantage ... (and the vault's own concept-cfir page carries the 1.0->2.0 rename table)"
    }
  ]
}